M/S Deepak Kumar Mohanty, Jajpur vs. Union Of INDIA

WP(C)/28686/2024HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01082645202412 October 2026Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI,MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that since the Petitioner's counsel had filed a memo in Court stating that the prayer made in the Writ Petition had become infructuous due to the rectification of the assessment order, which nullified the demand, the Petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petition. The Court noted that the rectification order was passed on September 19, 2026, in view of CBIC Circular No.183/15/2022-GST dated December 27, 2022. Accordingly, the Court permitted the Petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Facts

The Petitioner, M/s. Deepak Kumar, filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The Petitioner sought relief concerning an assessment order. Subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the Assessing Authority rectified the assessment order on September 19, 2026. This rectification was made in view of CBIC Circular No.183/15/2022-GST dated December 27, 2022. The rectification order nullified the demand previously raised against the Petitioner. Consequently, the Petitioner's counsel submitted a memo to the Court, stating that the prayer in the writ petition had become infructuous and requested permission to withdraw the petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition as the relief sought has been rendered infructuous by a subsequent rectification order. Petitioner's Argument: The Petitioner argued that the Assessing Authority had rectified the assessment order, nullifying the demand, in accordance with CBIC Circular No.183/15/2022-GST. Therefore, the prayer in the writ petition had become infructuous, and they should be allowed to withdraw the petition. Revenue's Argument: The judgment records no specific argument from the Revenue or Opposite Parties regarding the withdrawal of the petition.

Sections Cited

None explicitly mentioned as discussed in the judgment text provided.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28686 of 2024 CNR No. ODHC010826452024 M/s. Deepak Kumar Mohanty, Jajpur …. Petitioner(s) Miss Itishree Tripathy, Adv. versus- Union of India & Ors. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel for the Revenue Mr. Avinash Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue Mr. Satyanarayan Pattnaik, CGC CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No. 03.

ORDER 12.10.2026

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2.

Heard.

3.

By filing a memo in Court today, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the meantime, prayer made in the present Writ Petition has rendered infructuous as the Assessing Authority has rectified the assessment order in view of the CBIC Circular No.183/15/2022-GST dated 27.12.2022 vide Rectification Order dated 19.09.2026 wherein the demand has been nullified. She, accordingly, Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 13-Oct-2026 10:49:06 Signature Not Verifi

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.