Commissioner CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Aravali Infra Power LTD Kathua

CEA/247/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02005996202121 September 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner CGST and Central Excise Jammu against M/s Aravali Infra Power Ltd Kathua. The appeal concerns an issue that has already been considered by a Coordinate Bench of the High Court in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The appellant has not urged any new grounds in the present appeal. The previous appeals, which dealt with the same issue, were dismissed by the Court.

Held

The Court held that since the issue involved in the present appeal has already been considered and decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, and no new grounds have been urged by the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the previous judgment dated 23.05.2022. The ratio decidendi is that a Coordinate Bench's decision on a particular issue serves as precedent for subsequent similar matters, and in the absence of new arguments or distinguishing facts, the same outcome is expected. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal, concerning an issue already decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, should be dismissed on the same grounds as the previous appeals (CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals)? Petitioner's contention: The appellant argued that the present appeal should be dismissed as the issue involved has already been decided by a Coordinate Bench in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, and no new grounds have been presented. The appellant relied on the previous judgment. Respondent's contention: The respondent did not present any specific arguments as the appeal was dismissed based on the precedent set by the Coordinate Bench.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
S. No. 1 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 247/2022 CM Nos. 5323/2022 & 5324/2022 Commissioner CGST and Central Excise Jammu …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Vs M/s Aravali Infra Power Ltd Kathua .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Pranav Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun Dev Singh, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE

ORDER

The issue involved in this appeal has already been considered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, those appeals were dismissed. Since the matter stands already covered by the aforementioned judgment and in view of the fact that no new ground has been urged by the appellant, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in judgment dated 23.05.2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

(RAJESH SEKHRI) (RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE

JUDGE

Jammu 21.09.2022 Neha

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.