Commissioner CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. Zuventus Healthcare LTD Sidco Industrial Complex Bari Brahmana

CEA/299/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02003831202207 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The Commissioner CGST and Central Excise, Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against Zuventus Health Care Ltd. (respondent). The appeal concerns issues identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court noted that no new grounds were presented. The matter was considered squarely covered by a previous judgment dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals that have already been considered and decided by this Court vide its judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were available to the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the previous decision. The Court found no reason to deviate from its earlier pronouncements. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues with no new grounds are bound by previous judgments of the same court. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the prior judgment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that the present appeal raises identical issues and no new grounds are available to the appellant? Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant: The appellant argued that the appeal should be dismissed as it is identical to previous appeals decided by this Court and no new grounds are available. The appellant relied on the Court's previous decision in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Respondent: No arguments were recorded for the respondent.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 20 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 299/2022 CM Nos. 6440/2022, 6441/2022 Commissioner CGST and Central Excise Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < Zuventus Health Care Ltd. SIDCO Industrial Complex Bari Brahmana .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE

ORDER 07.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.