Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Crop Chemicals INDIA LTD Industrial Growth Centre Samba J And K

CEA/318/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02004393202214 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu against M/s Crop Chemicals India Ltd. The appeal concerns a matter identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh vide a judgment dated 23rd May 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court noted that no new grounds were available to the appellant. The appeal was therefore dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the earlier judgment.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court in its judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022, with CEA No. 10 of 2020 being the leading case. Since no new grounds were presented by the appellant, the matter was considered squarely covered by the prior decision. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as stipulated in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues and grounds as those already decided by the High Court, without presenting new arguments or facts, are bound to be dismissed on the same basis as the precedent.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is squarely covered by the High Court's previous judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that the present appeal raises no new grounds. The appellant argued that the matter is identical to the previously decided cases and therefore should be dismissed on the same terms. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 25 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 318/2022 CM Nos. 6570/2022, 6571/2022 Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < M/S Crop Chemicals India Ltd. Industrial Growth Centre Samba J and K .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 14.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dat

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.