Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Crop Chemicals INDIA LTD Industrial Growth Centre Samba J And K

CEA/316/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02004381202214 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu, filed an appeal against M/s Crop Chemicals India Ltd. The appeal was identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. The Court noted that the leading case for these previous decisions was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The petitioner's counsel was heard, and the Court found no new grounds were presented by the appellant. Consequently, the Court concluded that the present appeal was squarely covered by the earlier judgment.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant (Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu). Therefore, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned earlier judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues and grounds, without any new arguments or facts, are bound by previous High Court decisions on the same matter.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals, decided on May 23, 2022? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals that have already been decided by the Court. They contended that no new grounds have been raised in this appeal, and therefore, it should be dismissed on the same terms as the previous judgments. Respondent's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the respondent (M/s Crop Chemicals India Ltd.).

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 23 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 316/2022 CM Nos. 6563/2022, 6564/2022 Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < M/S Crop Chemicals India Ltd. Industrial Growth Centre Samba J and K .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 14.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dat

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.