Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Crop Chemicals INDIA LTD Unit -11 Industrial Growth Centre Samba J And K

CEA/315/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02004376202214 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu against M/s Crop Chemicals India Ltd. Unit-11. The appeal is stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. The leading case among those previous decisions was CEA No. 10 of 2020. The Court heard the counsel for the appellant and noted that no new grounds were available to the appellant. The matter was considered to be squarely covered by the previous decision.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals that were previously considered and decided by the Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022, with CEA No. 10 of 2020 being the leading case. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant. Therefore, the matter was considered to be squarely covered by the aforesaid decision. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The ratio decidendi is that if an appeal presents no new grounds and is identical to previously decided matters, it will be dismissed on the same basis.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals, as argued by the appellant's counsel. 2. Whether the appellant has presented any new grounds in the present appeal that would warrant a different decision. The appellant argued that the appeal is similar and identical to previous appeals decided by the Court and that no new grounds are available. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 22 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 315/2022 CM Nos. 6561/2022, 6562/2022 Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < M/S Crop Chemicals India Ltd. Unit-11 Industrial Growth Centre Samba J and K .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 14.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and o

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.