Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Vmco Alloys Sicop Industrial Area Kathua J And K

CEA/307/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02004394202214 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu against M/s VMCO Alloys SICOP Industrial Area Kathua. The appeal concerns an issue that is stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. The Court notes that the leading case for these matters was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court found no new grounds available to the appellant. The matter was considered squarely covered by the prior decision.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by its previous judgment dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The reasoning was based on the observation that the appellant had not presented any new grounds that would warrant a different decision. Therefore, the Court found no reason to deviate from its prior ruling. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with identical facts and no new arguments are bound by precedent. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the prior judgment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that no new grounds are available to the appellant. Arguments: Petitioner/Appellant (Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu): Contended that the present appeal is identical to previously decided matters and that no new grounds have been presented. Relied on the principle that similar matters should be decided consistently with prior judgments. Respondent (M/s VMCO Alloys SICOP Industrial Area Kathua): No arguments are recorded for the respondent in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 14 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 307/2022 CM Nos. 6479/2022, 6480/2022 Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < M/S VMCO Alloys SICOP Industrial Area Kathua, J and K .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 14.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 20

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.