Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Cadila Pharmaceuticals LTD Samba

CEA/306/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02004233202214 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu against M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Samba. The appeal was considered by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu. The Court noted that this appeal was similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court. The leading case among those was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court found no new grounds for the appellant. The matter was deemed to be squarely covered by the previous decision.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal was similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals that had already been considered and decided by the Court vide its judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. Having heard the counsel for the appellant, the Court was of the opinion that no new grounds were available to the appellant, and the matter was squarely covered by the previous decision. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The specific terms and conditions of the prior judgment were not detailed in this order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, as argued by the petitioner/appellant. The petitioner/appellant argued that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court, specifically referencing the judgment in CEA No. 10 of 2020. They contended that no new grounds were available to them in this appeal, and therefore, it should be dismissed on the same terms as the prior decision. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 13 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 306/2022 CM Nos. 6477/2022, 6478/2022 Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < M/S Cadila Phamaceuticals Ltd. Samba .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 14.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.