Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Emcure Pharmaceuticals LTD Sidco Industrial Complex Bari Brahamna Jammu

CEA/346/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02004669202228 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu, against M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The appeal is stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The leading case among those was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court noted that no new grounds were available to the appellant. The respondent was not represented.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by its previous judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. The reasoning was that the appellant had not presented any new grounds in this appeal, making it identical to the previously decided matters. Therefore, the Court found no basis to deviate from its earlier decision. The appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues without new grounds are bound by previous High Court judgments on those issues. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals, given that no new grounds are available to the appellant. Contentions of the Petitioner/Appellant: The appellant argued that the present appeal is identical to previous appeals that have already been decided by the Court. They contended that since no new grounds have been raised, the matter is squarely covered by the precedent set in the judgment dated May 23, 2022. Contentions of the Respondent: None were recorded as the respondent was not represented.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 10 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 346/2022 Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. …..Respondent(s) Through:- None. CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

ORDER

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No.10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No.10 of 2022 and connected appeals.

(M.A. Chowdhary) (Sindhu Sharma)

Judge

Judge

Jammu 28.11.2022 Michal Sharma

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.