Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Emcure Pharmaceuticals
Facts
This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise, Jammu against M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The appeal concerns a matter identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The Court notes that no new grounds are available to the appellant in this case. The judgment refers to a prior decision dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2022 and connected appeals, which is stated to squarely cover the present matter. The respondent, M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., was not represented before the Court.
Held
The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals that have been previously decided by the Court. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant, and the matter was squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10 of 2022 and connected appeals. The reasoning is based on the principle of consistency and adherence to previous judicial pronouncements in similar matters. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned prior judgment. No issues were expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10 of 2022 and connected appeals? The appellant argued that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals that have already been considered and decided by this Court. They contended that no new grounds are available to them, and therefore, the matter is squarely covered by the prior decision. The appellant relied on the principle of judicial precedent. The respondent did not present any arguments before the Court.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER
This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No.10 of 2020 was the leading case.
Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No.10 of 2022 and connected appeals.
(M.A. Chowdhary) (Sindhu Sharma)
Judge
Judge
Jammu 28.11.2022 Michal Sharma
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.