Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Saraswati Agro Chemicals PVT LTD Jammu

CEA/373/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02004375202205 December 2022Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu (Appellant) filed an appeal before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh against an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The CESTAT had set aside orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Adjudicating Authority, directing a refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess to M/S Saraswati Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent). This decision was based on the Supreme Court's ruling in 'M/s SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. V. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati'. A similar batch of appeals filed by the Appellant against CESTAT orders had been dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of the High Court on May 23, 2022. The present appeal also challenged a similar order on identical grounds.

Held

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu. The Court noted that the present appeal was against a CESTAT order that was similar to a batch of appeals previously considered and dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of the High Court on May 23, 2022. The grounds raised in the current appeal were also identical to those dealt with in the earlier judgment. To maintain parity and consistency, the Court decided to dismiss this appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the previous judgment. Any interim directions that were subsisting at the time of the order were vacated. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with identical facts and grounds, challenging orders similar to those already decided by a coordinate bench, should be dismissed on the same basis to ensure judicial consistency.

Key Issues

1. Whether the CESTAT was correct in directing the refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess to the assessee in light of the Supreme Court's decision in M/s SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. V. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati? The Appellant argued that the present appeal was filed against a CESTAT order that was similar to those considered and dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of the High Court on May 23, 2022, on identical grounds. Therefore, the Appellant contended that this appeal should also be dismissed on the same terms to maintain parity. The Respondent, M/S Saraswati Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., did not record any specific arguments in the judgment. However, their entitlement to the refund was based on the Supreme Court's decision in M/s SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. V. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati, which was relied upon by the CESTAT.

Sections Cited

Section 35G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Serial No. 17 Regular Causelist HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 373/2022 CM No. 7069/2022 CM No. 7070/2022 Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu. ….. Appellant(s) Through: - Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/S Saraswati Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Jammu. ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Vikrant Kackaria, Advocate. Mr. Jatin Mahajan, Advocate. Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.

ORDER

05.12.

2022 Ali Mohammad Magrey-CJ (Oral):

01.

At the very outset, what requires to be stated is that a batch of appeals were filed before this Court by the Commissioner, Central, GST and Central Excise (Jammu and Kashmir), Jammu under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 (fort short „the Act‟) against the orders of different dates passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short „the CESTAT‟), thereby setting aside the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Adjudicating Authority and directing for the refund of the Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess to the assesse

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.