Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise Jammu vs. Sds Remcides Crop Science PVT LTD Industrial Complex Bari Brahmana Jammu
Facts
The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against an order dated March 6, 2018, passed by CESTAT Chandigarh. The appeal was filed with a delay of 1450 days, for which a separate application for condonation of delay was submitted. The appellant's counsel conceded that a similar issue had been dealt with in CEA No. 10/2020, where the grounds for condonation of delay were identical. In that prior case, the Division Bench of the High Court had dismissed the appeal as being barred by limitation.
Held
The Court held that the appeal was barred by limitation. The reasoning was based on the fact that a similar appeal, CEA No. 10/2020, with identical grounds for condonation of delay, had been dismissed by a Division Bench of the same High Court on 23.05.2022. The Court found that the present case applied 'on all fours' to the precedent. Therefore, the application for condonation of delay was not accepted, and consequently, the appeal itself was dismissed. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal. No issues were expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the delay of 1450 days in filing the appeal should be condoned. This issue turns on the interpretation and application of principles governing condonation of delay in filing appeals. The petitioner argued that the delay should be condoned, but did not provide specific grounds in the provided text beyond acknowledging the delay and the existence of a similar prior case. The respondent's arguments are not recorded. The Court's decision was based on a precedent set in a similar case.
Sections Cited
Section 35G
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 13.02.2023
CM no. 537/2023
The appeal by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K) Jammu filed under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the final order dated 06.03.2018 passed by CESTAT Chandigarh, is delayed by 1450 days. Hence, a separate application seeking condonation of delay.
Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant fairly submits that the similar issue had arisen in an appeal bearing CEA No. 10/2020, wherein also the appellant/applicant had sought condonation of delay on similar grounds as have been urged in this application but the Division Bench of this Court did not accept the application and dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation. Sr.No. 10
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.