Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Jammu Pigments PVT LTD Kathua J And K

CEA/156/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006059202320 November 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise J&K Jammu, filed an appeal before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu. The appeal was against M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd. The Court noted that this appeal was similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court. The leading case for those decisions was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The Court observed that no new grounds were available to the appellant in the present case, and it was squarely covered by the prior judgment.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals that have been previously considered and decided by the Court, specifically referencing the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant in this case, and it was squarely covered by the precedent. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned prior judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals presenting identical facts and legal issues, without new grounds, are bound by previous judgments of the same court.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals? Arguments: Petitioner/Appellant: The appellant argued that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court, and no new grounds have been presented. Therefore, the matter is squarely covered by the prior decision. Respondent: No arguments were recorded for the respondent in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 156/2023 CM No. 6893/2023 CM No. 6894/2023 Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise J&K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd., Logate More, Kathua Jammu & Kashmir ….Respondent(s) Through :- - Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE

ORDER 20.11.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No.10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 passed in CEA No.10/2020 and connected appeals.

Jammu: 20.11.2023 *Raj Kumar*

(Puneet Gupta)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.