Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Jammu Pigments PVT LTD Kathua J And K

CEA/158/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006055202320 November 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu (Petitioner/Appellant) filed an appeal against M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent). The appeal concerns an unspecified tax period and challenges an order or action by an unspecified authority. The core of the matter is that this appeal is stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh vide a judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The petitioner's counsel was heard.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals that were considered and decided by the Court in its judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, with CEA No. 10 of 2020 being the leading case. Since no new grounds were available to the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the previous decision. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned judgment and order. The ratio decidendi is that appeals identical to previously decided matters, without new grounds, will be disposed of in line with those precedents. No specific operative directions were issued beyond the dismissal of the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given its similarity and identical nature to those cases? (Question of law). The Petitioner/Appellant argued that the appeal is identical to previous cases decided by the Court and therefore should be dismissed on the same terms. The Respondent did not record any arguments.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 158/2023 CM No. 6900/2023 CM No. 6901/2023 Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise J&K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd., Logate More, Kathua Jammu & Kashmir ….Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE

ORDER 20.11.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No.10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 passed in CEA No.10/2020 and connected appeals.

Jammu: 20.11.2023 *Raj Kumar*

(Puneet Gupta)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.