Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Jammu Pigments PVT LTD Kathua J And K

CEA/159/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006087202324 November 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd. The appeal concerns an issue that is stated to be identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The leading case among those previous decisions was CEA No. 10 of 2020, which was decided on May 23, 2022. The present appeal was heard by a division bench of the High Court.

Held

The Court held that the present appeal was squarely covered by the previous judgment of the High Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant (Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise). Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned prior judgment. The ratio decidendi is that if an appeal raises identical issues and no new grounds are presented, it will be dismissed following established precedent.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, as argued by the petitioner. The petitioner contended that no new grounds were available to them in the present appeal. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment. The core issue revolves around the applicability of a prior judicial precedent to the facts of the current case, particularly concerning central excise matters.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 159/2023 CM Nos. 6951/2023 & 6952/2023 Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise (J&K), Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd., Logate More, Kathua Jammu & Kashmir ….Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. R.S Parihar, Advocate vice Mr. Gautam Chugh, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE

ORDER 24.11.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No.10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 passed in CEA No.10/2020 and connected appeals.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.