U.P. Power Corporation Limited Lko. Thru. Deputy General Manager (Tax) Nitin Nijhawan vs. Director General Directorate General Of GST Intelligence Lko. And 3 Others
Facts
The petitioner, U.P. Power Corporation Limited, through its Deputy General Manager (Tax), filed a writ petition before the High Court. The respondents included the Director General, Directorate General of GST Intelligence, and three others. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The reason provided for withdrawal was that appellate proceedings arising from the same matter were pending before the appellate forum. The High Court heard the learned counsel for both the petitioner and the respondents.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition was permissible. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's stated intention to pursue appellate proceedings that were already pending before the appellate forum. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the pending appellate proceedings. No specific GST provisions were discussed or interpreted, and the decision did not delve into the merits of any underlying GST dispute.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel argued that withdrawal was sought because related appellate proceedings were pending before the appropriate appellate authority. The Court needed to decide if this constituted a valid ground for dismissal of the writ petition. The respondents' counsel was present and heard. No specific legal questions regarding GST provisions were argued or decided, as the matter was resolved based on the petitioner's request for withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 244 of 2025 Petitioner :- U.P. Power Corporation Limited Lko. Thru. Deputy General Manager (Tax) Nitin Nijhawan Respondent :- Director General Directorate General Of Gst Intelligence Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- Digvijay Nath Dubey,Dipak Seth,Kuldeepak Nag (K.D.Nag),S M Singh Royekwar Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.M. Singh Royekwar learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition due to the reason that the appellate proceeding arising out of the same are pending before the appellate forum.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to pursue the pending proceeding. . [Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 8.5.2025 kanhaiya KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.