M/S Rukveer Food Products PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And 2 Others

WP/16155/2020HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01025824202023 September 2020Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file an appeal. The Appellate Authority was directed to decide the appeal, which was to be filed by the petitioner, uninfluenced by an order dated May 16, 2018, passed by the Committee of Commissioners in Proceedings C.No.V/R/OlA/13/21l8-Review. No order as to costs was made. The Court also directed the office to return the original of the impugned order to the petitioner's counsel and closed all pending miscellaneous petitions.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Rukveer Food Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court for the State of Telangana challenging an order dated July 25, 2020, passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to declare the said order as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to principles of natural justice, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner also filed applications seeking a stay of further proceedings pursuant to the impugned order and to receive additional documents. The respondents were the Union of India, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, and the Commissioner of Central Tax.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition is maintainable in light of the availability of an appellate remedy under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner, through their counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the appellate remedy. Revenue's contention: Not recorded in the judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 83, Section 35

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD WRIT PETITION NO: 16155 OF 2020 Between: M/s Rukveer Food Products Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Sudini Venkataramana Reddy H.No.3-6-1812, G-2, Jaya Apartments, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad-500029. ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 Union of lndia, Rep. by its Under Secretary, Finance and Revenue, Central Secretariat, New Delhi.

The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Himayathnagar GST Division, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.

The Commissioner, Central Tax, Cenlral Excise and Service Tax, Hyderabad, GST Comm issiona rate, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction or a Writ or more particularly one in the nature of Writ of It4andamus declaring the order in O/R No.5/2020-ST dated.2510712020 of the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Himayathnagar GST Division, Narsapur Hous

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.