Chinkindi Bikshapathy vs. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others
Facts
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents (revenue authorities) to issue a pattadar passbook for land measuring 0.16 guntas at survey No. 160/aa and 0.08 guntas at survey No. 503 in Dundigal Village, Medchal-Malkajgiri district. The petitioner's grievance was the inaction of the respondents in processing her representation dated June 30, 2021, for the issuance of Digital Pass Books of Pattadars and Title Deeds. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus declaring this inaction as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to law.
Held
The High Court, without going into the merits of the case, disposed of the writ petition. The Court directed the petitioner to make a fresh application to the respondent No. 2 (presumably the concerned revenue authority) for the issuance of Digital Pass Books of Pattadars and Title Deeds through the online Dharani Portal within two weeks from the receipt of the order. Upon such application being filed, respondent No. 2 was directed to pass necessary orders thereon strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks thereafter. The Court also mandated that all interested persons be put on notice and their objections considered before passing the orders. The issue of whether the initial inaction was illegal or arbitrary was not decided, as the Court opted for a procedural direction to resolve the matter.
Key Issues
1. Whether the inaction of the revenue authorities in processing the petitioner's representation for the issuance of a pattadar passbook is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to law, thus warranting a writ of mandamus? The petitioner argued that the respondents' failure to act on her representation for over six months constituted inaction and a violation of her rights. The petitioner relied on the principles of natural justice and the expectation of timely disposal of applications by government authorities. The revenue authorities, through the Government Pleader, stated that if the petitioner makes a fresh application through the online Dharani Portal, the same would be considered and necessary orders would be passed in accordance with the law.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER 3 l]il:l3t'tr,'I3? tBl fl" J'il:, Y ?3i ";,fl 3 Maixaj'giri oistrict. o*? .n" state of relangana' Rep. by,its Principal secretary' Department of Revenue' iil:s*$,E*tt.nx#l*w'**rufl ,,s],ur*:n;,u*#gst;:i:, PetitionunderArticle226ollheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe clrcumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybepleased to issue a writ, order or dlrection more particularly one in the nature of writ of Ir,4andamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd to 4th respondents not issuing the pattadar pass book to an extent of 0.16 guntas at survey No. 160/aa and 0.08 guntas at survey No.503 at Dundigal Village, Gandi Maisamma- Dundigal Mandal, medchal - Malkajgiri district, is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and against the principles of natural justice and uncon
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.