Banoth Nandiay vs. The Special Deputy Collector
Facts
This appeal, LAAS No. 484 of 2008, was filed by claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the II Additional District Judge, Warangal, in LAOP No. 206 of 1999. The reference court had enhanced the market value from Rs. 20,000/- to Rs. 25,000/- per acre. The acquisition was for the excavation of a canal under DBM 48 SRSP. The acquired lands were situated in Amangal and Vavilala Villages, which are adjacent to Shanigapur Village and possess similar potentialities and soil nature. The High Court had previously dealt with a similar acquisition in Shanigapur Village in LAAS No. 524 of 2008, where it reduced the market value from Rs. 80,000/- to Rs. 70,000/- per acre. Both parties agreed that the reasoning from the previous judgment would apply to this case.
Held
The Court allowed the appeal in part. It held that the market value of the acquired lands should be enhanced from Rs. 25,000/- per acre to Rs. 70,000/- per acre. This decision was based on the agreement between both parties that the reasoning applied in the previous judgment of this Court in LAAS No. 524 of 2008, concerning the acquisition of lands in Shanigapur Village, would be applicable to the present case. In that prior judgment, the Court had reduced the market value from Rs. 80,000/- to Rs. 70,000/- per acre, considering factors such as the nature of cultivable lands, commercial crops grown, and strategic location, while also noting that reliance on smaller land transactions was not entirely justified. The claimants are entitled to all statutory benefits as per the amended Act. No order as to costs was made.
Key Issues
1. Whether the market value of the acquired lands in Amangal and Vavilala Villages should be enhanced beyond Rs. 25,000/- per acre, considering the similarity in potentiality and soil nature with Shanigapur Village, and the prior judgment of this Court in LAAS No. 524 of 2008. Petitioner/Appellants' Arguments: - The Appellants argued that the lands in Amangal and Vavilala Villages have similar potentiality and soil nature to those in Shanigapur Village. - They relied on the High Court's previous judgment in LAAS No. 524 of 2008, which dealt with the acquisition of lands in Shanigapur Village for a similar purpose. Respondent/Revenue's Arguments: - The Respondent did not dispute the similarity in potentiality and soil nature between the villages. - The Respondent agreed that the reasoning adopted by the Court in its judgment dated 16.09.2022 in LAAS No. 524 of 2008 would hold good for the present appeal.
Sections Cited
Section 54, Section 18
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
rN rHE HIGH "or*I{3$otfoBt#E oF TELANGANA THUR AY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAI 9I.S^EPTEMBER I I .Jr \vvl '.,vo inousnND AND TWENTY TWo THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G' SRI DEVI rHE HoNouRo" r= t*'' )T,?rlcE M'G'PRIYADARSINI PRESENT LAAS.No.48 4ol 2008 Appeal Under Section 54 of L-A' Act 1894 against the Judgment and Decree dated 09.08.2005 made in L A O P No'206 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge' Warangal' Between:
Banoth Nandiay, S/o Teiya' aged 50 years' 2. lslavath Sathru, S/o Somla' aged 45 years' 3. lslavath Ramji, S/o Ramji' aged 52 years'
Moola Sambaiah, S/o Gopaiah' aged 52 years'
Dodla Venkatayya, S/o Shankaraiah' aged 45 years' i. rlurrr"" Narasamma' W/o Venkataiah' aged 60 years'
N. Venkatayya, S/o Ramalingam All are Agriculturists R/o Aangal Village Mahabubabad Mandal B. Dharavath Deviia, S/o Roopla' aged 45 years'
Dharavath Umla, S/o Rekiya' aged 52 years' lo.Dharavath Sakru, S/o Hemla' aged 55 years' 1 I . Dharavath Bheemudu, S/o Rekiya' aged 56 years'
Moola Venkayya, S/o Sakru' aged 50 years'
Moola Venkayya, S/o Sakru' aged 45 years'
Dharavath Parsu, S/o Umla' aged 52 years'
Moola Baddiya, S/o Redya' aged 48 yea
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.