M/S. A.P. Steels LTD. And Various Companies (In Liqn) vs. No Respondent

COMPA/37/2022HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01035879202204 November 2022Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR5 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The Official Liquidator (OL) filed a Company Application seeking to appoint an auditor for the Estate and Establishment Fund Account and Company Paid Staff Terminal Benefit Fund Account for the period 01.04.2021 to 31.03.2022. The OL also prayed for fixing the audit fee, including GST, and permission to pay it from the Estate and Establishment Fund. The OL stated that the same auditor, M/s. T. Badarinath & Associates, had been appointed by the Court for the preceding two periods (01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020 and 01.04.2020 to 31.03.2021). The Court considered the application and the arguments presented by the counsel for the OL.

Held

The Court held that it was appropriate to appoint the same auditor, M/s. T. Badarinath & Associates, to audit the accounts for the period from 01.04.2021 to 31.03.2022, as the period was contiguous to the previously audited periods. The Court approved the proposed audit fee of Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) along with applicable GST, considering it to be reasonable. The Court further permitted the Official Liquidator to pay the audit fee, the cost of the application, and any other office expenses from the funds of the Estate and Establishment Fund Account. The ratio decidendi is that continuity in auditing by the same firm for contiguous periods is efficient and cost-effective, and the Court has the discretion to fix reasonable audit fees and permit payment from company funds under its supervision. No issue was expressly left undecided.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Court should appoint an auditor for the Estate and Establishment Fund Account and Company Paid Staff Terminal Benefit Fund Account for the period 01.04.2021 to 31.03.2022, and if so, which auditor should be appointed, pursuant to Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Rules 302, 309 & I of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959? 2. What should be the quantum of audit fee, including applicable GST, payable to the appointed auditor, and from which fund should it be paid? Contentions: Petitioner (Official Liquidator): Argued that for the contiguous periods of 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020 and 01.04.2020 to 31.03.2021, M/s. T. Badarinath & Associates was appointed by the Court to audit the said accounts. Therefore, it would be appropriate to appoint the same auditor for the current period. The OL proposed an audit fee of Rs. 40,000/- along with applicable GST, which was considered reasonable. The OL also sought permission to pay the audit fee and costs from the Estate and Establishment Fund Account. Revenue/State: No arguments were recorded for the Revenue or State in the judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 462, Rule 302, Rule 309, Rule I

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2022 IN R.C.C. NO. 2 0F 1995 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND ln the matter of M/s. A.P. Steels Ltd., and Various Companies ( ln liqn)

Between: The Official Liquidator, Attached to Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana and High Court of Andhra Pradesh. At Hyderabad ...Applicant Company Application Under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 302, 309 & I of the Companies ( Court ) Rules, 1959 praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to appoint Auditor to audit the Estate and Establishment Fund A,/c and Company Paid Staff Terminal Benefit Fund fuc for the period from 0110412021 to 3110312022 from the Chartered Accountant as mentioned in Para No.4 of the present application or any other Chartered Accountants as mentioned in other paras may be ordered by this Hon'ble Court. fix an amount of fee with GST thereon (as applicable )or any other amount towards audit fee payable to the Auditor, so appointed by this Hon'ble Court permit the Official Liq

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.