Amer Khan vs. The Superintendent Of Customs (Preventive)
Facts
The petitioner, Amer Khan, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) seeking bail. He is the sole accused in HQPOR No. 92 of 2022-Cus.Prev, registered by the Superintendent of Customs (Preventive), Customs Commissionerate, GST Bhavan, Hyderabad. The petition was filed pending investigation, enquiry, and trial. The petitioner sought to be enlarged on bail. The case involves allegations related to customs and GST matters, with the Superintendent of Customs acting as the respondent/complainant.
Held
The Court considered the criminal petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition. The Court granted the permission as prayed for. Consequently, the Criminal Petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No specific findings were made on the merits of the bail application or the underlying GST/customs case, as the withdrawal obviated the need for such adjudication. The operative direction was the dismissal of the petition.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail pending investigation, enquiry, and trial in HQPOR No. 92 of 2022-Cus.Prev? The petitioner argued for bail, seeking release pending the legal proceedings. The respondent, represented by the Public Prosecutor, did not present any arguments as recorded in the judgment. The primary issue was the petitioner's eligibility for bail in the context of the ongoing investigation by the Customs Department.
Sections Cited
Section 439
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
L il IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT Between: Amer Khan, S/o. Wahed Khan, Aged about 22 Years, Occupation Pvt.
Employee Rl/o. H. No. 19-3-29412111A, Guntalshandargah, Vattepally, Falaknuma, Hyderabad - 500 053. ...PETITIONERYSOLE ACCUSED AND The Superintendent of Customs (Preventive), Customs Commissionerate, GST Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad - 500 0004. Represented by Specia.l Public Prosecutor High Court ofTelangana, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on Bail pending investigation, enquiry and trial in HQPOR No. 92 of 2022-Cus.P rev. the Superintendent of Customs (Preventive) Customs Commissionerate, GST Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad in the lnterest of Justice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MALLURI RAMESH BABU, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State of Tel
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.