Ap Steels LTD vs. No Respondent

COMPA/6/2024HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01015530202403 May 2024Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR5 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The Official Liquidator, attached to the High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, filed a Company Application under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with relevant Rules. The application sought the appointment of an auditor for the Estate and Establishment Fund Account and the Company Paid Staff Terminal Benefit Fund Account for the financial year 2022-23 (April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023). The Official Liquidator also requested the Court to fix an audit fee of Rs. 40,000/- plus applicable GST, and to permit the payment of this fee and other miscellaneous expenses from the Estate and Establishment Fund Account. The application was supported by an affidavit and heard by the High Court.

Held

The Court appointed M/s. Murthy & Kanth, Chartered Accountants, to audit the Estate and Establishment Fund Account and the Company Paid Staff Terminal Benefit Fund Account for the financial year 2022-23 (April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023). The Court approved the audit fee of Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) plus applicable GST, considering it to be reasonable as suggested by the Official Liquidator. The Official Liquidator was also permitted to pay the audit fee, costs of the court application, and any other office expenses from the funds of the Estate and Establishment Fund Account. The application was ordered accordingly, with no costs awarded.

Key Issues

1. Whether an auditor should be appointed for the Estate and Establishment Fund Account and Company Paid Staff Terminal Benefit Fund Account for the financial year 2022-23, and if so, from which empanelled list or any other suitable Chartered Accountant. 2. What should be the reasonable audit fee, including GST, payable to the appointed auditor. 3. Whether the Official Liquidator should be permitted to pay the audit fee and other expenses from the Estate and Establishment Fund Account. The Official Liquidator argued for the appointment of an auditor for the specified period, citing the need for audit and referencing a previous appointment for the prior financial year. The Official Liquidator also proposed an audit fee of Rs. 40,000/- plus GST, considering it reasonable, and sought permission for payment from the company's funds. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the revenue or state, as this is a company application concerning the winding up of a company.

Sections Cited

Section 462, Companies (Court) Rules 302, Companies (Court) Rules 309, Companies (Court) Rules 9

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[ 3166 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 ln the matter of M/s. A.p. st""f. flIlend Various companies (in tiqn)

The.official Liquidator, Attached to Hon'ble court of relangana and Andhra pradesh, At Hyderabad. ...Applicant Company Application filed under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 302,309 & I of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 praying that this Hcn'ble Court may be pleased to i. to appoint an Auditor for audit of the Estate and Establishment Fund Account and Company Paid Staff Terminal Benefit Fund Account for the financial year 2022-23 (i.e., from 01-04-2022 to 31-03-2023) from the empanelled list of Chartered Accountants as mentioned in para No-3 of the present application or any other Chartered Accountants as may deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble High Court. ii. fix an amount of Rs.40,000/- plus GST (as applicable) as Audit fee or any other amount as may deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble High Court, which is payable to the auditor so appointed. iii. permit the Official Liquidator to pay such Audit fee from and out of the funds of Estate and Establishment Fund Account. iv. cost of

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.