The Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs vs. M/S. Sunder Silk Mills (P) LTD.

CEA/29/2012HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01017108201211 September 2024Bench: SUJOY PAUL,NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Revenue (Central Excise Appeals No. 1 of 2012) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, dated March 25, 2008. The CESTAT order was preferred against an order-in-appeal dated February 20, 2007, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Hyderabad. This, in turn, was against an order-in-original dated January 31, 2007, passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Division E, Hyderabad. The respondent is M/s Sunder Mills (P) Ltd. The appeal concerns the period leading up to the orders in original and appeal. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal.

Held

The Court allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning provided is that the appellant's counsel sought withdrawal with the liberty to file a fresh appeal under specific circumstances related to a recent CBIC circular. The respondent's counsel did not object to this request. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs were awarded. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appellant, the Revenue, should be permitted to withdraw the appeal. The appellant, represented by the Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, sought to withdraw the appeal. The grounds for withdrawal were not explicitly stated in the judgment, but the counsel requested liberty to file a fresh appeal if the matter fell within exceptions to a circular dated August 6, 2024, issued by the CBIC. The respondent's counsel had no objection to the withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

tN rHE HrcH couRTfg.-B_Tl1E STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNE AY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL rHE H.N,BLE sRr JUsrcE "til?ro*o"u RAJE.HWAR RAo CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALSNO I OF 2012 2 I[9?lll*"ner of Central Tax and Centrat Excise, Secunderabad GST uommrssronerate, GST, Bhavan Basheerba g h, FivOL-LOrO Between: AND ...APPELI-ANT M/s Sunder Sirk Mirs /p).Ltd-, Represented by Sri Bharat Kumar Aqarwar.

Manasins Direcror, r _s_62s, rbA, -Ar;;;;o],uv"il7ruua_s00 020 - ...RESPONDENT Appear under section 35 (G) of centrar Excise Act, 1g44 against the order of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore dated. 25-03-200B in Finar order No. 478 r 2008 prefened against the order-in-Appear No. oBt2ooT-(H-H)cE, dated. 20-02-2007 0n the fire of the commissioner ( Appears) Hyderabad preferred against the order_in_originar No. 41 2007 dated 31-1-2007 0n the fire of the Asst. commissioner, customs and Central Excise, Division _E, Hyderabad _ ll Commissionerate, Hyderabad. counsel for the Appeilant: sRI DoMrNrc FERNANDES (senior standing counsel for CBIC)

Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.