Instakart Services Private Limited vs. Deputy Director Directorate General Of GST & Anr.

W.P.(C)/14173/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01068864202408 October 2024Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kumar Visalaksh, Mr. Udit Jain, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC with Ms. Suhani Mathur & Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advs
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioner, Instakart Services Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an action by the Deputy Director, Directorate General of GST. The specific order or action under challenge is not detailed in the provided text, nor is the tax period or the amount in dispute. The procedural history indicates that the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition.

Held

The Court allowed the writ petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The key finding was that the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw their challenge before the High Court. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's request to address their contentions while responding to the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 04 August 2024. The ratio decidendi is that a party can withdraw a writ petition to pursue remedies available at a lower forum, provided their rights and contentions are expressly left open. The operative direction was to permit the withdrawal, subject to all rights and contentions being left open for adjudication in response to the show cause notice. No issue was expressly left undecided.

Key Issues

The primary issue was whether the petitioner could withdraw the writ petition. The court had to decide if the withdrawal should be permitted, and if so, under what conditions. The petitioner, through their counsel, prayed for liberty to withdraw the writ petition. The revenue, represented by its counsel, did not appear to have raised any specific objections to the withdrawal in the provided text, but the court's order implies their presence and the need for a formal order. The court's decision hinges on whether to allow the withdrawal and preserve the petitioner's rights to respond to the show cause notice.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14173/2024 & CM APPL. 59347/2024 (Stay) INSTAKART SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kumar Visalaksh, Mr. Udit Jain, Advs. versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC with Ms. Suhani Mathur & Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

O R D E R %

08.10.

2024 CM APPL. 59348/2024 (exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

This application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 14173/2024 & CM APPL. 59347/2024 (Stay) Learned counsel for the writ petitioner prays for and is accorded liberty to withdraw the writ petition subject to all rights and contentions being left open to be addressed while responding to the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 04 August 2024. Ordered accordingly.

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. OCTOBER 8, 2024/DR This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Por

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.