Ravi Prakash vs. The State Of Bihar
Held
The Court directed the release of the petitioner on bail. The reasoning appears to be based on the petitioner's status as a shopkeeper and his prior bail in similar cases. The Court granted bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge Excise, Siwan. A specific condition was imposed: the bailor must be a shopkeeper registered with GST or an income tax payee. The Court did not expressly leave any issues undecided.
Facts
The petitioner, Ravi Prakash, is seeking bail in connection with Barharia P.S. Case No. 302 of 2018. He is accused of offences under Sections 272, 273, 308 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 41(1) of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act, 2016. The prosecution alleges recovery of 15 liters of liquor from the petitioner's shop. The petitioner has been in custody since September 28, 2018. He has prior involvement in two similar cases where he was granted bail. The court is considering his release on bail.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner, a shopkeeper, is entitled to be released on bail in connection with Barharia P.S. Case No. 302 of 2018, considering the recovery of 15 liters of liquor and his prior criminal antecedents. Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner is a shopkeeper and has been granted bail in previous similar cases. The recovery amount is relatively small (15 liters of liquor). Revenue/State's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the State/Opposite Party regarding the bail application.
Sections Cited
GST
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER 2 17-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Barharia P.S. Case No. 302 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 272, 273, 308 of the Indian Penal Code and 30 (a), 41 (1) of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that earlier petitioner has been made accused in two cases in similar such allegation, however
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.