M/S Mahesh Pd. @ Mahesh Kumar Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA And Ors
Held
The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer for disposal of the writ petition. The Court directed that the period consumed in pursuing the present writ petition, from December 13, 2018, until the date of the order (September 5, 2019), shall be excluded while considering any limitation matter for the statutory remedy the petitioner intends to pursue. This implies the Court acknowledged the petitioner's right to pursue alternative remedies and provided relief regarding the time spent in litigation.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Mahesh Pd. @ Mahesh Kumar Singh, through its proprietor Mahesh Pd. Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court. The respondents included the Union of India, the Commissioner of Central GST, Patna Division, and other revenue authorities. The petitioner sought disposal of the writ petition to avail a statutory remedy. The petition was filed on December 13, 2018. After some arguments, the petitioner's counsel requested the court to dispose of the writ petition, indicating an intention to pursue a statutory remedy.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be allowed to withdraw the writ petition to pursue a statutory remedy? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner, through their counsel, requested the disposal of the writ petition to avail a statutory remedy. Revenue's Argument: The revenue authorities were present and heard the arguments. No specific argument against the withdrawal was recorded, but their presence indicates they were aware of the proceedings.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 24121 of 2018 ====================================================== M/s Mahesh Pd. @ Mahesh Kumar Singh through the proprietor Mahesh Pd. Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh, S/o- Ram Brickchh Singh through the proprietor, Mahesh Pd. Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh, R/o- Keshawe, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner Versus
The Union of India through the Department of Finance, New Delhi.
The Commissioner of Central G.S.T. Central Excise, Patna Division, Bihar, Patna.
The Principal Commissioner Central Excise and Service Tax 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Building (...................) Birchand Patel Path, Patna.
The Assistant Commissioner of Central GST and Ex. Cum Begusarai Division 2nd Floor, Power House Road, Near Petrol Pump, Begusarai.
The Superintendent, Central Excise and Service Tax Range Begusarai.
Punj Lioyd Ltd. Through its Managing Director, Corporate Office II, 95 Institutional Area, Sector – 32, Gurgaon 122001, India. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satendra Rai, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advv
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.