Union Of INDIA vs. One Auto Private Limited And Ors
Facts
The revenue (Union of India) filed an appeal against an order passed by a Learned Single Bench in a writ petition. The writ petition concerned the availing of transitional credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms under the Goods and Services Tax regime. The dispute arose from the inability of the respondent, One Auto Private Limited, to file or revise these forms. The appeal was filed before the Calcutta High Court.
Held
The Court held that in light of the comprehensive directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Anr. – Vs. – FILCO Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., no separate orders were required to be passed in this appeal. The Supreme Court's order provided a complete mechanism for assessees to avail transitional credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms by directing GSTN to open a common portal for filing and revising these forms. The Court reasoned that the Supreme Court's directions were binding and covered the subject matter of the present appeal. Therefore, the appeal and connected applications were disposed of in terms of the Supreme Court's order, effectively granting the relief sought by the respondent by allowing them to utilize the mechanism provided by the Supreme Court.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable in light of the Supreme Court's directions in Union of India & Anr. – Vs. – FILCO Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. regarding the availing of transitional credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms. The petitioner (revenue) argued that the appeal should be decided on its merits. The respondent (assessee) argued that the Supreme Court's order provided a comprehensive mechanism for addressing issues related to transitional credit and that the present appeal should be disposed of in accordance with those directions. The Supreme Court's order directed GSTN to open a common portal for filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms for two months, allowing aggrieved registered assessees to file or revise their forms irrespective of prior writ petitions or ITGRC decisions. It also mandated verification of claims and passing of orders on merits within 90 days thereafter.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Item no. 22 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION
APPELLATE SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam And The Hon’ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas FMA 555 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2021 IA No. CAN 2 of 2021
Union of India vs. One Auto Private Limited & ors. For the Appellant : Mr. Kaushik Dey
Mr. Tapan Bhanja
For Respondent : Mr. Anil Dugar Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee
Heard on : 01.09.2022 Judgment on : 01.09.2022 T.S. Sivagnanam J.: 1) This appeal by the revenue
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.