Sarada Construction And Another vs. The Assistant Commiussioner State GST And Others
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
2022. p.b.
Sl. No.105. WPA 9398 of 2021 Sarada Construction & Anr.
Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner, State GST, Central Section, Bureau of Investigation, Unit-4, Siliguri Zone & Ors.
Mr. Himangshu Kr. Ray. ……..for the petitioners.
Mr. T. M. Siddiqui, Mr. S. Mukherjee, Mr. D. Ghosh. ……..for the State.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner produces a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 1st September, 2022 in MAT No.1250 of 2022, in the case of the petitioner and submits that in view of the judgment of the Division Bench, this writ petition should be disposed of without passing any further order.
Considering such submission of the petitioner, this writ petition being WPA 9398 of 2021 is disposed of without passing any further order. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.