M/S. J K Enterprises vs. The Union Of INDIA
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. J K Enterprises, represented by its Proprietor, Sri Dasam Govardhan Goud, filed a writ petition before the Telangana High Court. The petition challenged a garnishee notice dated January 11, 2025, issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax (Respondent No. 3) to the petitioner's banker (Respondent No. 6). The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to declare this notice illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and ultra vires, infringing their fundamental rights and being contrary to statutory provisions. An interlocutory application was also filed seeking suspension of the garnishee notice's operation. The respondents included the Union of India, the Commissioner of Central Tax, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, and other GST authorities.
Held
The Court was approached by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner made this request. The respondents did not object to this request. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition. No costs were awarded. Any pending interlocutory applications were also closed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the garnishee notice dated January 11, 2025, issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax to the petitioner's banker, invoking Section 87(b)(iii) of the Finance Act, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and ultra vires, infringing the petitioner's fundamental rights and being contrary to statutory provisions? The petitioner argued that the notice was illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and an infringement of their fundamental rights, and contrary to statutory provisions. The respondents' contentions were not recorded in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 87(b)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH couRr r?+ I+E:IiI=^DoF TELANGANA (SPeciai Original Juri iction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL . . . TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURAELE Sili.fuSTICE RENUKA YARA [ 34461 garnishee notice and DIN Between: Ivl/s. J K Enterprises, Rep ' by its Proprietor' Sri Dasam Govardhan Goud' s/o. D Venkat"iart" ci"'Io' ;6dq 3qJ'i 48 v"ars' Rl/o' Kranthi Nagar' 5r"."I"rdri' tivoerabad - 500 035' T'S' ...pETlTtoNER WRIT PETITION NO:12 843 oF 2025 nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned d1.11.O1.2025 passed in C'No' lV11616512024-3T
The Asst Commissioner of Central Tax' Saroornagar GST Division' " #ft;tA;y'dommissionerate' Nagole' Hyderabao'
The Deputy Commissioner, Hyderabad Audit - | Comissionerate' Hyderabad 5.TheSuperintendentofCentralTax,saroornagarRange,Saroornagar' Hyderabad ' H:'',Jfil;i#l8fi Si,li',iJfiift?Sll$iT : ?a^"/16to 8' G B rowers' AND 1. The Union of lndia, Rep' by its Ministry of Finance' North Block' New Delhi
The Commissioner of Central Tax' Rangareddy Commissionerate' Nagole' Hyderabad ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in t
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.