Chandrashekar Pragada vs. Union Of INDIA
Facts
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging Order-in-Original No. 80/2023-24 dated 11.12.2023, issued by the third respondent. The petitioner sought to declare this order illegal, arbitrary, and violative of constitutional provisions and principles of natural justice. The petitioner also filed interim applications seeking suspension of the impugned order and permission to operate bank accounts, which were attached. The respondents included the Union of India, Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, and Additional Commissioner of Central Tax. The matter was heard by the High Court.
Held
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by treating the Order-in-Original dated 11.12.2023 as a show-cause notice. The Court directed the petitioner to file their reply to this show-cause notice within fifteen days from the date of the order. The appropriate authority is then required to decide the matter afresh, in accordance with the law, after considering the petitioner's reply. The Court explicitly stated that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. No costs were awarded. The interim applications, if any, were also closed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Order-in-Original No. 80/2023-24 dated 11.12.2023 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice. Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the impugned order is illegal, arbitrary, and violates fundamental rights and natural justice. The specific grounds for this contention are not detailed in the provided text, but the prayer indicates a challenge to the validity and fairness of the order. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments presented by the respondents (revenue).
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
I I I I I r t 34461 H'GH cou Rr'?+ ItESIlIii: ]:-T-*-^ tsP."ii oriiittat Juri iction) Iil,'Ji.?AJ.lI.='ift B,,ff["-?{IlOl THE HONOURABLE THE ACTTNG CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL THE HONOURABI-T S#.ft STICE RENUKA YARA PRESENT WRITPETITIONN Ot14104 OF 2025 1 I i : i i i ! \ tI ""*"?#"r**p-=EFffi :ffi s.fl'fl ',#'{fi #tll-'"s'?t'?l;'*ffi t ...PETITIONER ^- j Hpgfl,[i*i*;;: :":"":: T :]J:;l' I"'-";"Llj :ffi ti$$g'r'mm'r*+g*:lil'l*'mff il::::. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ' order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relation to Order-in-Original No 80/2023- 24 dated 11'12'2023 vide DIN No' 20231256YP080000F2EC issued by 3rd respondent and declare the same as illegal' arbitrary and violative of articles 14' 21 of constitution of lndia and beside violative of principles of natural justice and consequentlY quash the same
IANO:1 OF 1102:i Petition Lrr (ler Section 151 CpC praying that in the circ lmstances stated in the affidavir fitrC in support of the petition, the High C
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.