M/S. A.P. Steels LTD. And Various Companies (In Liqn) vs. No Respondent
Facts
The Official Liquidator, attached to the High Court for the State of Telangana, filed a Company Application seeking directions for the audit of half-yearly accounts of 101 companies in liquidation for the period from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The application proposed allocating these companies among three Chartered Accountants' firms. It also sought to dispense with the audit for 18 companies with no transactions and 14 companies with only minimal expenses. The Official Liquidator further requested permission to pay an audit fee of Rs. 500 plus GST per company, as per a previous court order dated April 8, 2022, and to utilize the companies' funds or the Official Liquidator's Estate and Establishment Fund for these payments. The application also requested that the costs of the application be borne by the respective companies in liquidation.
Held
The Court held that the audit work for the period October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, is required for all 101 companies. It reasoned that the auditors' work might be less for companies with no transactions, but the total number of companies must be distributed. Consequently, the Court permitted the Official Liquidator to seek assistance from the three specified auditors' firms, allotting them companies in the ratio of 34:34:33. The Court also allowed the Official Liquidator to pay each auditor a fee of Rs. 500 plus GST per company and to submit the audited accounts for approval. The Court did not explicitly address dispensing with the audit for companies with no transactions or minimal expenses, but by ordering the distribution of all 101 companies for audit, it implicitly directed that audit work would proceed for all, albeit potentially with less effort for some. The ratio decidendi is that in matters of liquidation audits, a structured allocation of companies among auditors is permissible, and the fee structure previously approved in similar circumstances can be applied.
Key Issues
1. Whether the allocation of 101 companies in liquidation among three Chartered Accountants' firms, in the ratio of 34:34:33, for the audit of half-yearly accounts for the period October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, is to be approved. 2. Whether the appointment and audit of half-yearly accounts for 18 companies with no receipts or payments, and 14 companies with only court fee stamps and notary charges as expenses, for the period October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, can be dispensed with. 3. Whether the Official Liquidator is permitted to pay an audit fee of Rs. 500 plus GST per company to the appointed Chartered Accountants, and to make such payments from the respective companies' funds or the Official Liquidator's Estate and Establishment Fund, subject to reimbursement. The Official Liquidator argued that a previous order dated April 8, 2022, in a similar application, squarely covered the subject matter and that a similar order should be passed. The revenue or State did not present any arguments.
Sections Cited
Section 457, Section 462, Rule 298, Rule 300, Rule 302, Rule 304, Rule 306, Rule 309, Rule 9
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
[ 31681 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNE AY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FUE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN COMPANY APPLICATION No. 83 of 2025 IN R.C.C. NO: 2 of 1995 ln the mafter of the Companies Act, 1956. AND ln the matte of M/s. A.P. Steels Ltd. & Various Companies (in liqn)
The.Official Liquidator, attached to the Honourable High Court of Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh, 1st floor Corporate Bhawan, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyierabad - 500068. ...Appticant Application under Section 457 & 462 of tre Companies Act, 1956 read with and Rules 298,300,302,304,306 & 309 and further read riyith Rule g of the Companies (Court) Rules't959 praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: take this affidavit and facts stated herein on record. approve the allocation of 101 companies (in liqn) as per Annexure-A among 3 Chartered Accountants viz.,1). M/s. Murthy and Kanth, Chartered Accountant, Hyderabad 2). M/s. Padmanabha Rao and Co., Chartered Accountant, Hyderabad 3). M/s. K.B.S. Associates, Chartered Accountant, Hyderabad proportionately (i.e., 34 companies each to two auditors at Sl.No.1 and Sl.No.2 and 33 companies to one
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.