M/S Parshant Zippers vs. M/S Omega Zippers
Facts
The Plaintiff, M/s Parshant Zippers, filed a commercial suit against the Defendant, M/s Omega Zippers, seeking recovery of Rs. 4,07,43,002/-. The dispute arose from outstanding dues for goods purchased by the Defendant from the Plaintiff. The parties were referred to mediation, and on September 27, 2024, they entered into a Settlement Agreement. Under this agreement, the Defendant agreed to pay a total sum of Rs. 62,00,000/- in full and final settlement of the Plaintiff's claims. This settlement amount was to be paid to M/s Shanti Yarn Traders, a proprietorship concern of Sh. Gaurav Gupta, to whom the Plaintiff owed substantial dues. The Defendant handed over three cheques totaling Rs. 62,00,000/- to M/s Shanti Yarn Traders at the time of signing the settlement. The Settlement Agreement stipulated that upon clearance of these cheques, the Defendant would be absolved of all liability to the Plaintiff concerning the suit's claim.
Held
The Court held that the Suit should be decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. The Court noted that the parties had arrived at an amicable settlement through the mediation process. The Settlement Agreement stipulated that the Defendant would pay Rs. 62,00,000/- as full and final settlement, and this amount was paid via three cheques to M/s Shanti Yarn Traders. The Court found that the settlement was entered into voluntarily and that the parties had undertaken to abide by its terms. Consequently, the Court directed that a decree sheet be drawn up in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. Furthermore, in accordance with Section 16 of the Court Fee Act, the Court directed the Registry to take steps for the refund of the court fee deposited by the Plaintiff. The Suit, along with any pending applications, was disposed of.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Court should decree the suit in terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties, considering the payment of the settlement amount by the Defendant to M/s Shanti Yarn Traders. Petitioner/Plaintiff's Arguments: The Plaintiff argued that a settlement agreement had been reached, and the Defendant had fulfilled its obligation by handing over cheques totaling Rs. 62,00,000/- to M/s Shanti Yarn Traders. The Plaintiff sought to have the suit decreed in terms of this settlement, which would absolve the Defendant of further liability. The Plaintiff also sought a refund of court fees deposited, citing Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, and Section 89 of the CPC, 1908. Revenue/State's Arguments: No arguments were recorded for the Revenue or State in this matter, as it was a commercial suit between two private parties that was settled through mediation.
Sections Cited
Section 16, Section 89
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R %
2024
The instant Suit is for recovery of Rs.4,07,43,002/-.
The parties were referred to mediation and a settlement agreement has been entered into between the parties before the Mediation Centre on 27.09.2024. The Settlement Agreement reads as under: “
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Settlement Agreement is being entered into on this the 27.09.2024 BY AND BETWEEN M/s Parshant Zippers at G-I7/33, First Floor, Sector- 15, Rohini- 110085, through its Proprietor Sh. Prashant Jain (Hereinafter referred to as the "First Party"). The First Party is being produced from the Judicial Cu
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.