Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd,) & Anr. vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.

W.P.(C)/9575/2017HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01475344201707 January 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Mr. Suresh Aggarwal, Mr. Chetan Kumar Shukla, Mr. Parveen Kumar Gambir and Mr. Sunjay Sharma, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Ms. Arti Bansal, Special Panel Counsel with Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel along with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Shivang Chawla, Mr. Shyam Sunder Rai & Mr. Shubham Dayma, Advocates. Mr. Manu Krishnan and Mr. Tejasvi Chaudhry...
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

These petitions were filed in 2017 by the Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) and another petitioner, challenging issues that arose with the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST). During the pendency of these petitions, the Court had directed meetings to address the concerns raised. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that several issues have since been resolved. Consequently, the petitioners indicated they no longer wished to pursue these petitions.

Held

The Court noted the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitions were filed in 2017 due to various tedious issues faced by assessees with the introduction of GST. It was further submitted that meetings were directed during the course of these petitions, and several issues have since been resolved. Based on this submission, the petitioners stated they did not wish to press their petitions any longer. The Court accepted this submission and accordingly disposed of the petitions as withdrawn. No specific legal provisions were discussed or interpreted as the matter was resolved by the parties' consent to withdraw.

Key Issues

The primary issue was whether the petitions, filed in 2017 concerning various difficulties faced by assessees upon the introduction of GST, should be allowed to proceed. The petitioners argued that since many of the issues they raised have been resolved through subsequent meetings and actions, they no longer wish to press their petitions. The respondents, the Union of India and others, did not present arguments against the withdrawal, as the petitioners themselves sought to withdraw the petitions.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) 9575/2017
W.P.(C) 10284/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9575/2017, CM APPL. 38987/2017 & CM APPL. 5150/2020

SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD,) & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Mr. Suresh Aggarwal, Mr. Chetan Kumar Shukla, Mr. Parveen Kumar Gambir and Mr. Sunjay Sharma, Advocates.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Special Panel Counsel with Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel along with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Shivang Chawla, Mr. Shyam Sunder Rai & Mr. Shubham Dayma, Advocates. Mr. Manu Krishnan and Mr. Tejasvi Chaudhry, Advocates for Tech Mahindra. Mr. MP Devnath, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Rahul Kumar and Ms. Shreya Tandon, Advocates (Representative of Infosys) 5 +

W.P.(C) 10284/2018 & CM APPL. 40111/2018

SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD.) & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Mr. Suresh Aggarwal, Mr. Chetan Kumar Shukla, Mr. Parveen Kumar Gambir and Mr. Sunjay Sharma, Advocates.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents This is a digitally signed order. The a

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.