M/S Hardwyn INDIA Limited vs. Directorate General Of GST Intelligence , Gurugram Zonal Unit

W.P.(C)/672/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01001462202506 February 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR2 pages
For Petitioner: Appearance not givenFor Respondent: None
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The writ petitioner, M/s Hardwyn India Limited, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court. The investigation leading to the dispute was undertaken by the Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax Intelligence, Gurugram Zonal Unit. The petitioner alleged that a deposit was made under duress and protest with this respondent. The petitioner's unit is located in New Delhi. The respondent is the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Gurugram Zonal Unit.

Held

The Court held that the mere existence of the writ petitioner's unit in New Delhi does not constitute a material part of the cause of action. The investigation was undertaken by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Gurugram Zonal Unit, and the deposit was also made with this respondent. Therefore, the Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition. The Court dismissed the writ petition with liberty reserved to the writ petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court, if so advised. The specific jurisdictional High Court was not identified in the order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Delhi High Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition, considering that the investigation and deposit were made with the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Gurugram Zonal Unit, and the petitioner's only connection to Delhi is the existence of a unit there? (Question of law) Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that the existence of its unit in New Delhi constitutes a material part of the cause of action, thereby conferring territorial jurisdiction on the Delhi High Court. (No specific authorities or precedents were mentioned in the judgment for the petitioner's argument). Respondent's contention: The respondent, through its absence, did not present any arguments. However, the Court's reasoning implies that the respondent's position would be that the Delhi High Court lacks jurisdiction.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 672/2025 M/S HARDWYN INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE , GURUGRAM ZONAL UNIT .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

O R D E R %

06.02.

2025 CM APPL. 3301/2025 (EX.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 672/2025

1.

Undisputedly, as per the disclosures made by the writ petitioner itself, the investigation was undertaken by the Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax Intelligence, Gurugram Zonal Unit. The deposit which is alleged to have been made under duress and protest was also made with the said respondent.

2.

In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that the mere existence of the unit of the writ petitioner in New Delhi would not constitute a material part of the cause of action.

3.

We, consequently, dismiss the writ petition with liberty reserved to the writ petitioner to approach the juri iction

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.