Jain Automobiles vs. Union Of INDIA

CW/6926/2020HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC01033125202027 January 2023Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court noted that the extended period for filing TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms, as granted by the Supreme Court and further extended by the CBDT circular, had concluded on November 30, 2022. The Court did not grant a fresh extension but instead provided the petitioner with liberty to apply for filing the TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms in the event that the respondents further extend the window for submitting these forms. The reasoning appears to be that the Court would not create a new extension but would allow the petitioner to avail of any future extensions provided by the authorities. The operative direction is to allow the petitioner to apply if the window is further extended.

Facts

The petitioner, Jain Automobiles, filed a writ petition seeking an extension of the window to submit TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms. The Supreme Court had previously extended the period for furnishing these forms for two months from September 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022, via a judgment dated August 29, 2018. Subsequently, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) further extended this period until November 30, 2022, through Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST dated September 9, 2022. The petitioner approached the High Court after this extended period had concluded.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a further extension for filing TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms beyond the period extended by the Supreme Court and the subsequent CBDT circular. The petitioner argued for an extension, implying a need for more time to comply with the filing requirements. The respondents, Union of India and others, did not present any arguments as recorded in the judgment. The judgment does not explicitly state the arguments made by the petitioner beyond the implicit request for an extension, nor does it detail any specific legal provisions or precedents relied upon by either party.

Sections Cited

None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2023/RJJD/002512] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6926/2020 Jain Automobiles, Main Road, Kesharganj, NH 27 Road, Bijolian, Bhilwara, Rajasthan Through Its Proprietor Ramesh Chandra Jain S/o Shri Gheesi Lal Jain, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of 1239/2, Near Bada Jain Mandir, Bijolian, Bhilwara. ----Petitioner Versus

1.

Union Of India, Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Commissioner (Gst), Gst Policy Wing, Central Board Of Excise And Customs, Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India, New Delhi.

3.

Good And Service Tax Council, Tower-Ii, 5Th Floor, Jeevan Bharti Building, New Building Through Its Secretary.

4.

Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax Department, Range Azad Nagar, Bhilwara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naman Maheshwari, on behalf of Mr. Rajvendra Saraswat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 27/01/2023 The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction for extension of window to submit the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.