M/S. Apoorva Exports vs. The Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Apoorva Exports, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur. The respondents were the Union of India through the Commissioner (GST), the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Jaipur, and the State Tax Officer (GST), Jodhpur. On August 23, 2024, the respondents' counsel submitted a communication indicating that the petitioner-firm's GST registration (GSTIN: 08ABBFA5466G1ZH) had been cancelled on its own application effective from June 30, 2023. The petitioner's counsel then informed the court that the authorized person of the erstwhile petitioner-firm had instructed him to withdraw the writ petition.
Held
The Court noted the communication from the respondents' counsel that the petitioner-firm's GST registration had been cancelled on its own application effective June 30, 2023. The Court also noted the petitioner's counsel's statement that he had received instructions to withdraw the writ petition. In light of these submissions, the Court ordered the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn. The stay application, which was ancillary to the writ petition, was also dismissed as infructuous. The Court did not delve into any substantive GST provisions or the merits of any potential dispute, as the matter was resolved by the parties' mutual agreement to withdraw.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as withdrawn, considering the petitioner's instruction to withdraw. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner's counsel argued that they had received instructions from the authorized person of the erstwhile petitioner-firm to withdraw the writ petition. Therefore, the petition should be dismissed as withdrawn. Revenue's contention: The respondents' counsel submitted a communication dated August 23, 2024, stating that the petitioner-firm's GST registration had been cancelled on its own application. This fact supports the withdrawal of the petition as the underlying issue, if any, related to the GST registration might have been resolved or rendered moot by the cancellation. No specific argument was recorded against the withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order 23/08/2024 Mr. Hemant Dutt, the learned counsel for the respondents supplied a copy of communication dated 23.08.2024 as per which, the GST registration of the petitioner-firm (GSTIN:- 08ABBFA5466G1ZH) has been cancelled on its own application w.e.f. 30.06.2023. The communication dated 23.08.2024 is taken on record.
[2024:RJ-JD:35007-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-15187/2018]
Mr. Rahul Sharma, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the authorised person of the erstwhile petitioner-firm has given instruction to him to withdraw the writ petition.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Stay application stands dismissed. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J (SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR),J 15-Hanuman/Tikam-
Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.