Shashi Kumar Paswan vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, GST Bureau Of Investigation , Durgapur Zone And Ors
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, Shashi Kumar Paswan, claims to be the driver of a vehicle that was detained. He has filed this writ petition seeking the release of the vehicle. The petitioner has stated his willingness to pay the penalty as per the law. The Goods and Services Tax Bureau of Investigation (South Bengal), Durgapur Zone, is the respondent authority. The detention of the vehicle is the subject matter of the dispute. The tax period is not specified. The amount in dispute is not mentioned.
Held
The Court observed that the petitioner, claiming to be the driver of the detained vehicle, has expressed his willingness to pay the penalty in accordance with law. Taking into consideration the proviso to Sub-section (6) of Section 129 of the WBGST Act, the Court directed the respondent authority to release the vehicle in question within 48 hours from the date of fulfillment of the terms and conditions as per the aforesaid section. The reasoning is based on the petitioner's undertaking to pay the penalty and the statutory provision allowing for release upon such payment. The ratio decidendi is that a vehicle detained under Section 129 of the WBGST Act can be released upon the owner or driver fulfilling the penalty requirements as per the proviso to Sub-section (6) of Section 129.
Key Issues
1. Whether the vehicle detained by the respondent authority should be released upon the petitioner's willingness to pay the penalty in accordance with law, as per the proviso to Sub-section (6) of Section 129 of the WBGST Act? The petitioner argued that he is the driver of the detained vehicle and is agreeable to pay the penalty as stipulated by law, thereby seeking the release of the vehicle. The petitioner relied on the proviso to Sub-section (6) of Section 129 of the WBGST Act. The State's contentions are not explicitly recorded in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 129
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2022.
Zone & Ors.
Mrs. Rita Mukherjee, Mr. Shanshyam Jha, Mr. Rowsan Kr. Jha. ……..for the petitioner.
Mr. A. Ray, Mr. S. Mukherjee, Mr. D. Ghosh, Mr. D. Sahu. ………for the State.
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner is claiming to be the driver of the vehicle in question alleged to have been detained has filed this writ petition for relief of release of the same by contending that the petitioner is agreeable to pay the penalty in accordance with law. Taking into consideration proviso to Sub-section (6) of Section 129 of the WBGST Act respondent concerned, within 48 hours from the date of fulfilment of the terms and conditions as per the aforesaid Section shall release the vehicle in question.
With this observation, this writ petition being WPA 25802 of 2022 is disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.