Rainbow Infrastructure Private Limited And Another vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Goods And Services Tax Barrakpore Zone And Others
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioners, Rainbow Infrastructure Private Limited & Anr., filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court. The petition was against the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Goods and Services Tax, Barrackpore Zone & Ors. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history leading to the High Court is also not elaborated upon, beyond the filing of the writ petition. The amount in dispute, if any, is not mentioned. The matter came before the Court on March 28, 2025.
Held
The Court held that the writ petition could be dismissed as withdrawn. The reasoning was based on the explicit submission by the petitioners' counsel that they wished to withdraw the petition. The State's lack of objection further supported this decision. The Court took on record the email communication dated March 28, 2025, which apparently conveyed the petitioners' instruction to withdraw. Consequently, any interim order that might have been in place was vacated. The ratio decidendi is that a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn if the petitioner so desires and the respondent has no objection.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the writ petition should be allowed to be withdrawn. The petitioners, through their learned advocate, submitted that they had received instructions to withdraw the writ petition as they were desirous of doing so. The State, represented by its learned advocate, did not raise any objection to the withdrawal. The Court had to decide whether to permit the withdrawal based on the parties' submissions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
20 28.03.2025 sb Ct 5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURI ICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 7159 of 2020
Rainbow Infrastructure Private Limited & Anr. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Goods and Services Tax, Barrackpore Zone & Ors.
Mr. Vinay Shraff
Mr. Dev Agarwal
Ms. Priya Sarah Pal
… For the petitioners.
Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. GP
Mr. T. M. Siddiqui
Mr. N. Chatterjee
Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty
Mr. Saptak Sanyal
… For the State.
Learned advocate representing the petitioners by placing before this Court the printout of e-mail communication dated 28th March, 2025 would submit that he has been instructed to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioners are desirous of withdrawal of the same.
Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate representing the State does not raise any objection.
Having regard thereto, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Let a copy of the communication dated 28th March, 2025 be taken on record.
2
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.