Raj Finoxides Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Bureau Of Investigation South Bengal Head Quarter And Ors.
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, Raj Finoxides Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court at Calcutta. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The reason for withdrawal was to avail the benefit of Section 128A of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which was inserted via a notification dated January 10, 2025. The State, represented by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax and other officials, was also a party to the proceedings. The Court heard the learned advocates for both parties.
Held
The Court held that since the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition, the petition should be dismissed as withdrawn. The reasoning is straightforward: the petitioner explicitly requested to withdraw the case to pursue remedies under Section 128A of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court granted this request. The ratio decidendi is that a party has the right to withdraw their case if they deem it appropriate, especially when seeking to avail statutory benefits. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. No issues were expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to withdraw the writ petition to avail the benefit of Section 128A of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that they should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to take advantage of the newly inserted Section 128A of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. This provision likely offers some form of relief or mechanism that the petitioner wishes to pursue. Revenue/State's contention: The judgment records no specific argument from the State regarding the petitioner's request to withdraw. The State was represented, and their advocates were heard, but their stance on the withdrawal application is not detailed in the provided text.
Sections Cited
Section 128A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2 11.04.2025 sb Ct 5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURI ICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 23938 of 2023
Raj Finoxides Private Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner of State tax, Bureau of Investigation, South Bengal Head Quarter, Directorate of Commercial taxes & Ors.
Mr. Anil Kumar Dugar
Ms. Suman Sahani
… For the petitioner.
Mr. Anirban Ray, GP
Md. T. M. Siddiqui AGP
Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty
Mr. Saptak Sanyal
… For the State.
The petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition in order to avail the benefit of Section 128A of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which has been inserted vide notification dated 10th January, 2025. 2. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. Since, the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid writ petition, let the same be dismissed as withdrawn. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.