Rabindra Narayan Das vs. Deputy Commissioner Of State Tax Krishnanagar And Ors.
Facts
The petitioner, Rabindra Narayan Das, challenged an order dated August 31, 2023, passed by the appellate authority under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax (WBGST) Act. The appellate authority dismissed the petitioner's appeal solely on the ground of a 129-day delay, without considering the merits of the case. The petitioner contended that the delay was attributable to his illness and supported this claim with medical documents. He sought condonation of the delay and a remand of the matter to the appellate authority for a hearing on the merits of his appeal.
Held
The Court held that while the petitioner could have filed the appeal directly, the medical documents presented warranted consideration. In the interest of justice, the Court set aside the impugned order of the appellate authority. The matter was remanded back to the appellate authority on the condition that the petitioner pays a cost of Rs. 30,000/- to the GST authority within ten days from the date of the order and provides proof of payment to the appellate authority. Upon fulfillment of this condition, the appellate authority is directed to consider and dispose of the appeal on its merits. The Court did not expressly leave any issue undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appellate authority erred in dismissing the petitioner's appeal on the sole ground of delay without considering the merits, given the circumstances presented by the petitioner? The petitioner argued that the delay in filing the appeal was due to his illness, supported by annexed medical documents. He contended that in the interest of justice, the delay should be condoned and the matter remanded to the appellate authority for a decision on the merits. The State's contentions were not explicitly recorded in the judgment.
Sections Cited
WBGST Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
WPA 22487 OF 2023 26.09.2023
Sl no. 22
Rabindra Narayan Das. Ct no. 2
- Vs - P.M. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Krishnanagar & Ors.
Mr. Rituraj Chakraborty
… for the petitioner
Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. Govt. Pleader Md. T. M. Siddiqui, Mr. S. Sanyal
… for the State
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 31st August, 2023 passed by the appellate authority under the WBGST Act dismissing the appeal of the petitioner on the ground of delay of 129 days without going into the merit of the appeal. Petitioner submits that the delay was due to the illness of the petitioner and has annexed the supporting medical documents and submits that for the interest of justice delay should be condoned and matter be remanded back to the appellate authority to hear the appeal on merit. Since petitioner has filed this writ petition by affirming the affidavit he could have in the same way filed the appeal before the statutory appeal b
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.