Md. Manjar vs. The State Of Bihar

CR. MISC./68691/2023HC PatnaGSTCNR BRHC01094937202318 December 2023Bench: MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The petitioners, Md. Manjar and Md. Israil, are seeking regular bail in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 151 of 2023, registered under Sections 8(C) and 21(C) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleges that 354.8 liters of Codeine syrup were recovered from the house of Md. Major Alam, where the petitioners were apprehended. The petitioners claim innocence and false implication. Petitioner No. 1 is stated to be the proprietor of Maa Medico, holding a valid license for dealing in drugs and paying GST and other taxes. It is also argued that the seized quantity of codeine is approximately 354.8 grams, which is below the commercial quantity of 1 kg. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents and have been in judicial custody since August 11, 2023.

Held

The Court considered the facts and circumstances of the case, including the custody period of the petitioners. While the judgment does not explicitly detail the legal arguments regarding the NDPS Act provisions or the GST aspect, it focuses on the bail application. The Court found the petitioners eligible for bail. The reasoning appears to be primarily based on the duration of their custody and the arguments presented by the petitioners regarding the quantity of seized codeine being below the commercial limit and their lack of criminal history. The Court directed that the petitioners be released on bail after the framing of charges, if not already framed, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge NDPS Act, Purnea.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail under the provisions of the NDPS Act, considering the quantity of seized contraband and their alleged involvement. Contentions of the Petitioners: The petitioners argue that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated. They highlight that Petitioner No. 1 possesses a valid license for dealing in drugs and pays GST and other taxes, suggesting legitimate business operations. Crucially, they contend that the seized quantity of codeine, stated as approximately 354.8 grams, is significantly below the commercial quantity threshold of 1 kg, which is a key factor in determining the severity of the offense under the NDPS Act. They also emphasize their lack of criminal antecedents and their prolonged period of incarceration since August 11, 2023, as grounds for granting bail. Contentions of the Revenue/State: The learned APP appearing for the State opposed the prayer for regular bail.

Sections Cited

Section 8(C), Section 21(C)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68691 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2023 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== 1. Md. Manjar Son Of Rajiuddin Resident Of Village - Harchandrapur, Ward No. 6, Ps- Jalalgarh, Distt- Purnea 2. Md. Israil Son Of Md. Alimuddin Resident Of Village - Mahsaili, Ward No. 1, Ps- Bounsi Basethi, Distt- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. Mr.Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

3 18-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 151 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 8 (C), 21(C) of the NDPS Act.

3.

As per prosecution case, the petitioners are said to have been apprehended from house of Md. Major Alam from where, total 354.8 li

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.