Manas Patra vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur

Original PDF →
WP(C)/31704/2026HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01075676202630 September 2026Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI,MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN3 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.31704 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010756762026 Manas Patra …. Petitioner Ms. Itishree Tripathy, Advocate along with Mr. Jitendra KumarPalei, Advocate -Versus- Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, CT & GST, Jagatsinghpur …. Opposite Party Mr. Sourav Tibrewal, Additional Standing Counsel, CT & GST Organization CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 30.09.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2.

Learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits that the show cause notice dated 30th May, 2025 followed by order dated 22nd July, 2025 cancelling the registration certificate of the petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is under challenge. He submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid along with the return. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others), wherein it has been observed as follows:- "

2.

In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

2.1.

He submits, the claim of the petitioner to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

3.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Department-opposite parties upon perusal of said order, conceded that in the event the petitioner complies with the requirement and deposits the amounts as undertaken, the authority concerned shall do the needful.

4.

In view of conceded position, the petitioner shall make payments as undertaken within a period of two weeks

hence and on such eventuality the opposite party shall consider application for revocation of cancellation of the registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from today.

5.

In view of the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge

(Murahari Sri Raman) Judge Aswini/MRS

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.