M/S Madhu Powertech Private Limited vs. The State Of Telangana

Original PDF →
WP/28959/2026HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01059009202607 September 2026Bench: APARESH KUMAR SINGH,G.M. MOHIUDDIN6 pages
For Petitioner: SRI SHAIKH AHMED ALIFor Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[ 3488 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G'M. MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION NO: 2895I OF 2026 Between: M/s MADHU PoWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, Rep by its Managing Director,-Sri. Akula Madnusudhan S/o Akula Nageshwara Rao, Aged about 65 Years' Occ' Business, R/o Plot No.368 and 369-, Sriram Nagar Colony, Gajularamaram (V), Quthbullapur (M), Hyderabad, Telangana, 500055 ..PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Secretariat Hyderabad 2. The Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST), Hyderabad Rural, Telangana' 3. The Assistant Commissioner, lda Gandhi Nagar, presently Gajularamaram, QuthbullaPur, Telangana. +. The Staie Tax bfficer, lda Gandhi Nagar, presently Gajufaramaram' QuthbullaPur, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffldavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents herein more particularly Respondent No.2 to permit the Petitioner to avail Appellate remedy under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act on sympathetic ground, without being persuaded by the delayinchallengingtheorderdaled26.04.2024lorFY.2ol}-2olgandorderdated 30.08.2024 lor FY . 2019-2020, in the interest of justice' l.A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to take any coercive actlon / recovery proceedings against the Petitioner pending adjudication of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHAIKH AHMED ALI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 4: SRI K'SAI AKARSH, AGP FOR STATE TAX

The Court made the following: ORDER

lr-ara IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. OHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No.28959 OF 2026 (CNR No HBHC0I0s90092026) Dated: 07.09.2026 Between: M/s. Madht Powertech Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr. Akula Madhusudhan, S/0. Akula Nageshwara Rao '.Petitioner and The State of Telangana, Rep, by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others. ...Respondents ORDER: Heard Mr. Shaikh Ahmed AIi, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K. Sai Akarsh, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader appearing for State Tax

2.

The Writ Petition has been preferred with the following prayer: "... to issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents herein more particularly Respondent No.2 to permit the Petitioner to avail Appellate remedy under Section 107(l) olthe CGST Act on sympathetic ground, without being persuaded by the delay in challenging the order dated 26.04.2024 fot FY 2018-2019 and order dated 30.08.2024 for FY 2019-2020 in the interest of justice and pass such other and further orders as are just and necessary in the circumstances of the case."

- 2

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned orders. He submits that some delay might have been occurred in approaching the appellate authority and therefore, the appellate authority may be directed to consider the appeal sympathetically.

4.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for State Tax submits that the petitioner is at liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned orders taking all the grounds as are.available to it in law and on facts before the appellate authority in respect ofthe subject tax period.

5.

However, upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, since the petitioner seeks liberty to prefer an appeal, we do not wish to comment on the merits of the contentions raised by the parties.

6.

Therefore, we grant liberty to the petitioner to prel-er an appeal within a period of two weeks with statutory pre-deposit and a delay condonation application. The petitioner may take all such grounds of law and on facts in the memo of appeal as are available to it. Needless to say, the appellate authority would consider the question of delay taking into account the aforesaid facts and circumstances and if it is eaa J satisfied on the point of detay, proceed to decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law.

7.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed' //TRUE GOPY// HUSSAIN ALI ASSrsrANr touo* sECTK OFFICER To 8. PSK. GJP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Secretariat Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST), Hyderabad Rural, Telangana. The Assistant Commissioner, lda $andhi Nagar, presently Gajularamaram, Quthbullapur, Telangana. The State Tax fficer, lda Gandhi Nagar, presently Gajularamaram, Quthbullapur, Telangana One CC to SRI SHAIKH AHMED ALl, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI K.SAI AKARSH, SC FOR STATE TAX IOPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT DATED: 0710912026 ORDER WP.No.28959 of 2026 1!{E S'T416,. oo fB srP z;il * Oa ,\ ( 2 a' l. qi:r''"- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. T 2t 7 >(

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.