Anumolu Lakshmi Tejaswini vs. The State Of Telangana

Original PDF →
WP/3932/2023HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01006734202310 February 2023Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY5 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[ 3183 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 3932 OF 2023 Between: Anumolu Lakshmi Telaswini, Cio Anumolu Rama Rao Aged about 30 years, Occ. House Hold, R/O Plot No.303, Celestial, Kokapet, Ranga Reddy District. ..PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, T.S 2. The DGP of Telangana, Lakidakapool, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Khammam at Khammam, Telangana. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Khammam, at Khammam, Telangana. 5. The station House Officer, Tallada Police Station, Khammam District, Telangana-500035. 6. Gadiparthi Rani, W/o. Ramesh Aged about 42 Years, Occ. House-wife FUO .Gollagudem, Punubally Mandal Khammam District. T.5-507302 7. Palakurthi Sathish Kumar, S/O.Srirama Murthy Aged about 38 Years, Occ. Business Rl/O Kurella Gudem, Bhimadole Mandal Eluru Dist., B. Gadiparthi Ramesh, S/o.Krishna Murthy Aged about 48 Years, Occ. Business Rl/O Gollagudem, Punubally Mandal Khammam District. T.S-507302 9. Anumolul Rama Rao, S/o.Bhaskar rao Aged about 53 Years, Occ. Farmer Fl/O. Muddunur, Tallada Mandal Khammam District. 10. Dursheti Venu Gopal, S/o Aged about 49 Years, Occ. Teacher R/O Near Karimnagar Kamman, Karimnagar, Telangana - 505185. l l.Anumolu Manoj Kumar, S/o.Rama Rao Aged about 27 Years, Occ. Pvt.employee Fi/O Muddunur, Tallada Mandal Khammam District. '12.Anumolu Krishna Kumari, Wio.Rama Rao Aged about 50 Years, Occ. House- wife R/o Muddunur, Tallada Mandal Khammam District. ...RESpONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not registering the FIR against the unofficial respondents and the same is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against the principles of the natural justice and violation of articles '14, '19 and 21 of the constitution of lndia. lA NO: 'f OF 2023 Petition und rr Section 151 CPC praying that in the {)ircu rstances stated in the affidavit filec irr support of the petition, the High CoU: mzry be pleased to direct the official respondents to register the FIR agri,.inst the unofficial resporrdents consir erring the complaint dated 2310112023 locg ed by the petitioner pendirrg disposal o rhe above writ petition. Couns,el for the Pe :itioner: SRI JANARDHAN GOUD SUNKAIII Counsel for the Re ;pondent Nos.1 to 5: ASST. GP FOR H()MrE Counsel for the Re ;pondent Nos.6 to 12: - - - -

The Cr>urt made th r following: ORDER

I I HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3932 OF 2023 ORDER: This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.S-Station House Officer, Tallada Police Station, Khammam District, in not registering the First lnformation Report against unofficial respondents on the complaint of the petitioner, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 2l of the Constitution of lndia

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, and perused the material available on record 3. ln the written instructions received by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, it is stated that on receipt of complaint from the petitioner, respondent No.S made GD entry on 28.01 .2023. Enquiry revealed that the matter was purely family issue, as such, complaint was closed and notice intimating the same was issued to the petitioner through registered post. A copy of the notice, intimating closure of the complaint, along with postal receipt is served on the learned counsel for the petitioner.

t) -) 4. ln view oI the above, the writ petition is clcst::!. Hcwever, the pelitioner is r iven liberty to invoke appropriate l:,gal remedy if aglrieved by tl er closure report As a : erquel thereto, miscellaneous applirations, if any, perding in the vrrt petition stand closed. No order as t: r;osts. SI)/.A.V.S. PRASAD ASSIS'IANT REGIgTRAR //// v SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 E One CC to ;lil JANARDHAN GOUD SUNKARI, Advoca'er OPUCI Two CCs tc Gp FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Ti:langana. [OUT] Two CD Co rte s N L]S Bsq l ,i l

HIG;H COUR T DATED:1010212023 ORDER WF'.No.393i of 2023 CLOSING T {E WRIT PETITION WI HOUT C OSTS S IA I-," .a /,. l(, ',-) , 11 n[H ?t21 (7 \L-r''lll' (, A 7 \ ( 13 gStr

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.