M/S.Sri Bheemeshwara Pharma vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Sri Bheemeshwara Pharma, filed a Writ Petition before the Telangana High Court challenging the inaction of the respondents in not granting an approved or migrated GST Registration Certificate from their Provisional Registration, dated June 28, 2017. This inaction prevented the petitioner from logging into the GST portal, submitting monthly returns, and paying due taxes. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to redress their grievance. The petition also included an interim application seeking directions to restore portal access for generating e-way bills, enabling business operations and allowing buyers to claim input tax credits.
Held
The Court noted the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, the petitioner's grievance has been redressed, and the petitioner has been granted the GST registration number. Recording this submission, the Court closed the Writ Petition. No costs were imposed. The reasoning is based on the fact that the issue raised in the petition was resolved during the pendency of the proceedings. The ratio decidendi is that when a petitioner's grievance is redressed during the pendency of a writ petition, the petition can be closed as infructuous. The operative direction was to close the Writ Petition and any pending miscellaneous petitions.
Key Issues
1. Whether the inaction of the respondents in not granting an approved or migrated GST Registration Certificate from the provisional registration, thereby preventing the petitioner from accessing the GST portal to file returns and pay taxes, is arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the GST Act, 2017, and Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India? Petitioner's Arguments: The petitioner contended that the respondents' inaction was arbitrary, violated the GST Act, and infringed upon their fundamental rights to carry on business and equality. They sought a mandamus to compel the respondents to grant the registration and allow portal access. Respondents' Arguments: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the respondents. However, the court's order implies that the grievance was addressed subsequently.
Sections Cited
GST Act, 2017, Article 14, Article 19(1)(g)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following ORDER I I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHII{ WRIT PETITION No.22977 of 2Ol8 ORDER: (Per Hon'blc Sri Justice'1. \/inod Kumar-) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to filing of the present Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition has bcen redressed and the petitioner has been granted with GST registration number.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. .M.MA NJU DEPUTY REGIS T AR /I// SECTION OFFICER I To 1. Two CCs to GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX, High Court for the State of Telanoana at Hvderabad lOUTl 2 o;; ic i; Assf sor-rcrioR GENERAL oF INDIA Advocate (oPUC) 3 on; aa io SRI.SHAIK VAHEEDA SUSHIMA, Advocate [oPUC] 4 One CC to SRl.M.V.J.K.KUtvlAR, Advocate (OPUC) 5 Two CD CoPies
One spare coPY t S.A. BS SC I
i HIGH COURT DATED:1 411012022 ORDER WP.No.22977 ot 2018 CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. 1 HE sTAra .l q il J 12 rEr 2m > o 4' .1 _ t> ob SK- yL -1, @
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.