M/S. Mogulla Akhil vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Mogulla Akhil, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration by the Deputy State Tax Officer, Khammam Circle-III. The cancellation was based on a notice dated 29.03.2023, with a subsequent notice dated 14.01.2024. The petitioner contended that the cancellation was without proper cause, necessary details, and violated principles of natural justice, as well as constitutional provisions. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to declare the action void and illegal, and to set aside the cancellation order and revoke the registration revocation. An interlocutory application was also filed seeking suspension of the cancellation order and permission to file returns.
Held
The Court did not decide on the merits of the case. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file a properly constituted petition. The respondents had no objection to this request. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition. No costs were imposed. The interlocutory applications, if any, were also closed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration by the Deputy State Tax Officer, Khammam Circle-III, vide Reference No. 2A360323153354R dated 29.03.2023, was void, arbitrary, illegal, without authority of law, without jurisdiction, and in violation of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 265 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the cancellation was done without proper cause and necessary details, violating fundamental rights and natural justice. They sought to have the cancellation order and the subsequent notice set aside. Respondents' Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments or contentions from the respondents. However, their presence as respondents indicates their role in the cancellation process.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER
TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON,BLE DT. WSTICE G. RADHA RAIYI WRIT PETITION No.32662 of 2o24 ORDER (per Hon'ble SP,J) Sri J. Sai Vamshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax appearing for the respondents. 2. tcarned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with the liberty to file a properly constituted petition.
The other side has no objection.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the Iiberty prayed for. No costs- Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. '-S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //// SrcTON OFFICER
OneCC to SRl. J SAI VAMSHI Advocate IOPUCI
Two CCs to Special Govt Pleader for State Tax , High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
Two CD Copies KKS GJP To, u
HIGH COURT DATED:1311212024 ORDER WP.No.32662 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS sra E H 2025 ilAq [:1p611-,-r( /:. J $ o ( 1 t) t (+ Il :. &t 6
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.