M/S Al Muneer Mm Traders vs. The Superintendent
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s Al Muneer MM Traders, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration. The cancellation order was issued by Respondent No. 1, the Superintendent, Jagityal Range, Karimnagar Division, vide order dated 02.12.2024. The petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus to declare the notice dated 29.10.2024 and the subsequent order void, illegal, and without jurisdiction, and to restore its GST registration. The petition also sought suspension of the impugned order. The respondents included the Superintendent, the Joint Director of GST Intelligence, and the Union of India.
Held
The Court noted that the Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC produced an order (OC.No.158/2025, dated 14.02.2025) issued by Respondent No. 1, informing the Court that the cancellation order dated 02.12.2024 had been revoked. Consequently, the Court found that the writ petition had become infructuous. The Court disposed of the petition, reserving liberty to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner by issuing a fresh show cause notice in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded.
Key Issues
1. Whether the cancellation of GST registration order dated 02.12.2024 is void, arbitrary, illegal, without authority of law, and without jurisdiction, violating the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 265 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner argued that the order was illegal and violated their fundamental rights. The revenue, represented by the Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, did not explicitly present arguments on the merits of the cancellation order during the hearing. The primary issue that arose for consideration was the subsequent development concerning the cancellation order.
Sections Cited
GST REG-17, GST REG-19
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JT.ISTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION No.394O of2o25 (Per the Hon'bli the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul) Sri M.Uma Shankar, learned counsei representing Sri V.Veeresham, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andSriDominicFernandes,learnedSeniorStandingCounsel for CBIC, appea-rs for respondent Nos' 1 and 2'
The challenge is mounted to the cancellation of registration order dated 02.12-2024 '
Learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC produced the OC.No.158/2025, dated 14.O2.2025 issued by respondent No'1 and informed that the said cancellation order has been revoked' Therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous'
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of' by reserving liberty to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner by issuing fresh show cause notice' in accordance with law. No costs ) I ORDER:
i,:, 2 interloc,rtory applications, if any pending, shr l also stand closed T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //' su* To, TION OFFICER The Suoerintendent, Jagityal Range, Karimnag.ar Division' Medchal. . c.ji',ilj5."i',iiiliiri.i,'il;l Fi;br' A.r't6.d-z-zsort,-Manikanta comrrlex' Hanuman Nagar, Karirrrnagar-50500'1 TheJointDirector,O/o.DirectorateGeneralofG^S.T^lntellioence'Hvderabad Zonar U nit, H No. 1 -63/42liz,"e',"r,ji N-;' ) i l ilg i::' BlocL-B' (avuri Hills' -e", ttZ f u= e ; g, nl p"t, M ad h a p r t, H yd e ra b ad - 5 0 0 0 3 3 The Secretary,Union of lndia, Ministry of Finance' North Block New Delhi- 1 10001 One CC to SRl. V. VEERESHAIV'I Advocate [OPUC] oneCCtoSRl'DoMINICFERNANDES(seniorstandingcounselforCBlC) loPUCl / One CC to SR.I PULIMAMIDI SHASHIDHAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] Two CD CoPies ?k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KKS GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:20102t2025 ORDER WP.No.3940 of 2O2S (r- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ::=:- /:< i5 HE rrii..i c 2/ t'lirn 20ff i.o. * t-x*: \4 t/7 | --- )>r' 1
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.