M/S Guru Enterprises vs. Ms. Chanchal Yadav
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s Guru Enterprises, filed a contempt petition (CONT.CAS(C) 1648/2024) against Ms. Chanchal Yadav, the respondent. The petitioner sought initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged willful disobedience of the directions issued by the High Court on September 19, 2024, in W.P.(C) No. 13104/2024. The previous order had directed the respondent to cancel the GST registration of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. The petitioner contended that this direction had not been complied with. The respondent's counsel appeared and stated that an appropriate decision would be taken within four weeks from the date of the hearing.
Held
The Court noted that the petitioner had filed the contempt petition due to the alleged willful disobedience of the order dated September 19, 2024, which directed the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The respondent's counsel, on advance notice, submitted that an appropriate decision would be taken within four weeks. Based on this undertaking by the respondent's counsel, the Court disposed of the contempt petition. The operative direction was that the directions of the Court, as contained in the order dated September 19, 2024, passed in W.P.(C) No. 13104/2024, be complied with within four weeks from the date of the order. No specific finding on willful disobedience was made, as the matter was resolved by the undertaking.
Key Issues
1. Whether the respondent has willfully disobeyed the order dated 19.09.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 13104/2024, thereby constituting contempt of court? (Question of fact and law) The petitioner argued that the respondent had failed to comply with the court's explicit direction to cancel their GST registration, as evidenced by the contempt petition. The respondent, represented by the Additional Standing Counsel, did not contest the fact that the cancellation had not yet occurred but sought time for compliance. The respondent's counsel submitted that an appropriate decision would be taken within four weeks from the date of the hearing.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R %
2024
This hearing is being conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 61047/2024 (Ex.)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1648/2024
The petitioner is seeking initiation of the contempt proceedings against the respondent for the alleged willful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 19.09.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 13104/2024. 5. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the respondent is present on advance notice.
In a nutshell, this Court has directed the respondent to cancel the GST registration of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible which evidently has not been done. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:06:23
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the respondent submits that appropriate decision would be taken within four weeks from today.
Based on the aforesaid undertaking, the present contempt petition is disposed of directing that the directions of this Court vide order dated 19.09.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 13104/2024 be complied within four weeks from today.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J. OCTOBER 18, 2024 Sp/SA
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:06:23
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.