M/S. Akshaya Teja Shree Engineering Works vs. Deputy State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER
- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KIIMAR SINGH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No. 28335 of 2026 DATED :01.09.2026 Between: M/s. Akshaya Teja Shree Engineering Works AND Deputy State Tax Officer, Narayanpet Circle, and two others ORDER: ... Petitioner ... Respondents Sri K.P. Amarnath Reddy, leamed counsel appears for petitioner. Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Governlnent Pleader for State Tax appears for respondents.
The petitioner filed an applicati"on on 31.10.2025 for revocation ol cancellation of registration before the competent authority against the order for cancellation of registration dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure P.3) issued in FORM GST REG-19, to which a show cause notice was issued on 16.06.2025 (Annexure P.2) pursuant to which the petitioner failed to file reply leading to rejection of the application for revocation of cancellation of registration vide order daled 25.07 .2026. By that time, the limitation for filing an appeal had also expired.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that because of non- filing of the returns by the Tax Consultant, the reply to the show cause notice could not be f,rled inadvertently'.'l'herefore, one opportunity may be granted to the petitioner either to tile reply to the show cause notice
-t H --: i\rs, J, & GU \!. i ',! P No 28335 ot2026 for fresh corsideration of the petitioner's application for revocation of cancellation of registration or to make a fiesh application for revocation of cancellati,:n of registration.
Learned counsel for State Tax submits that the petitioner may be allowed to l;ubmit fresh application ibr revocation ol cancellation of registration refbre the competent authoritv w'rthin a stiPulated period which may be considered by the competent authority in accordance with law.
Consi,lering the subrnissrons made by the learned counsel fbr the parties and i[ the lacts and circurnstances and for the grounds stated in the writ affic.avit. we deem it proper to give liberty to the petitioner to file a lresh application fbr revocqlion of canccllation of registration belore the competent authoritl, rvithin a period ol two (2) weeks, manually. If rruch an application is filed. the competent authority would consider the ;ame in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the rejection of the earlier application on ground offailure ro file reply. Accorclingly. the instant Writ petition is disposed ol. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications. rf any pending, shall stancl closed. //// T.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2 To, sEC FFICER ,*" 1 . Deputy State Tax Ofr11e1, Oio -Assistant Commissioner (State Taxes), Narayanpet Circte, Mahabunrrg"i Di"irio;,, i";;;:", 2 Joint Commissioner (State Taxes),, N/"hrbrb;;;; Division, Tetangana. 3 The secretary to Government .(Revenue; cr-i, state Taxes / commercial Taxes Department, Secretariat, XyOeranJ. - , ', !
One CC to SRl. K.P. AMARNATH REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 5.TwoCCstoGPFoRSTATETAX,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT] Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD Copies u. PSR TKS
HIGH COUR''Ii DATED: 0'110912026 ORDER WP.No.2833li of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PIETITION WITHOUT C()STS. ( ;n flE SI4 r6 B.: q 2 : "c5P 2rtt Jo L) >'l "i -/' @vr ( q c\, th
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.