M/S.Maa Tareni Coal Transport Firm, Angul vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Talcher-I Range, Talcher

Original PDF →
WP(C)/30955/2026HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01074261202625 September 2026Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY3 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.30955 of 2026 [CNR No.ODHC010742612026] M/s. Maa Tareni Coal Transport Firm, Angul …. Petitioner(s) Ms. Itishree Tripathy, Adv. Mr. J.K. Palei, Adv. -versus- Superintendent, CGST & Central Excise, Talcher …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Sujan Kumar Roy Choudhury, Sr. Standing Counsel (CGST & Central Excise) CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. 01.

ORDER 25.09.2026

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

2.

Learned advocate appears on behalf of Petitioner submits that the show cause notice dated 8th September, 2025 followed by order dated 14th October, 2025 cancelling the Registration Certificate of the Petitioner under the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is under challenge. She submits that the Petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid along with the return. She relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others), wherein it has been observed as follows:- "

2.

In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

2.1.

She submits, the claim of the Petitioner to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

3.

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Department-Opposite Party upon perusal of said order, conceded that in the event the Petitioner complies with the requirement and deposits the amounts as undertaken, the authority concerned shall do the needful.

4.

In view of conceded position, the Petitioner shall make payments as undertaken within a period of two weeks hence and on such eventuality the Opposite Party shall consider application for revocation of cancellation of the registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from today.

5.

In view of the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

6.

Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

Sipun

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.